If you’ve been following the World Cup you might have seen that Japan isn’t doing so hot this time around. (Although neither is the U.S., for that matter.)
All the soccer passion in the world (and Japan definitely has a healthy percentage of it) won’t by itself win you a tournament. Japan has a solid team with a devoted following, but to the disappointment of many their chances of making it through the first round have become despairingly slim.
At this point it’s katsu shika nai—winning is all that matters. After getting tired in the last ten minutes of game 1 and letting Australia come from behind to win, then eking out a scoreless tie in an exhausting match against Croatia yesterday, Japan does not hold its destiny in its hands. Even a win in game 3 against Brazil (“miraculous” comes close to describing that scenario) might not get them into the final 16. But still it’s katsu shika nai. Anything less than a win is not acceptable.
From my perspective Japan fields a good team. But there’s something that keeps them from being a great team. I don’t think it’s from lack of individual skills or personal effort, because they are solid in both those areas. I suspect it’s from a lack of creativity. Soccer is not a game of set plays that can be analyzed and categorized like baseball—it’s a fluid, ever-changing environment of attack and defense, charge and retreat. The great teams, I think, can break outside of practiced scenarios and come up with new methods on the pitch. I don’t really see this too much from Japan, although maybe someone else has a different opinion. (Let me know what you think with the comment form at the end of this entry!)
To a great extent the people here have recognized that Japan might not survive (a realization that probably began after the loss to Australia), but I think a good percent of the soccer fan segment will get up at 4:00 in the morning to watch the match against Brazil this week. I don’t really see a poor performance in the World Cup hurting Japan’s newfound love for soccer, either. There’s 2010 to look forward to, after all.
Comments
David Schaab wrote on June 21: